GOP Candidate Rogers Accuses Opponent El-Sayed of Criticizing Breast Cancer Research; Fact-Check Rebuts Claim

Grand Rapids Kalamazoo Battle Creek, MI, October 5, 2026 —

U.S. Senate candidate Mike Rogers, a Republican, has invoked a 2012 essay penned by his Democratic opponent, Abdul El-Sayed, alleging that El-Sayed criticized breast cancer research funding and its advocates. However, a subsequent fact-check has disputed Rogers’ interpretation of El-Sayed’s remarks.

According to reports, Rogers has cited El-Sayed’s 2012 essay in his campaign messaging. The Republican campaign’s claim suggests that the essay contained sentiments opposing or undermining efforts related to breast cancer research and the individuals involved in advocating for it.

A fact-check examining El-Sayed’s essay concluded that its actual focus was on the influence of lobbying on the allocation of research funding. The analysis indicated that El-Sayed’s writing argued for greater equity in how funds are distributed, rather than launching an attack on breast cancer advocates or expressing opposition to the research itself.

The discrepancy highlights differing perspectives on how policy issues, specifically concerning research funding and advocacy, are presented and interpreted in the political arena. The fact-check aimed to clarify the substance of El-Sayed’s past statements, distinguishing between a critique of systemic influences on funding and a rejection of the research or its supporters.

The precise details of the essay’s content and the specific language used by El-Sayed were the subject of the fact-check. The findings suggest that the narrative presented by Rogers’ campaign may not accurately reflect the original intent or primary arguments made in El-Sayed’s 2012 publication. The contractor’s name or specific details of the fact-checking organization were not provided in the summary.

Story summarized from the original created by Miles MacClure for Bridge Michigan on bridgemi.com, see more information here.

Media gallery